Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
Of the Type A models, for all growth functions the anamorphic form fitted substantially better than the common-asymptote form, although the general polymorphic form provided the best fit.
For Type A models, both anamorphic and common-asymptote forms of all four functions were tested.
Type B models were developed as extensions of the general polymorphic Type A models.
The BIC of Type C models was consistently smaller than for the best Type A models indicating the existence of regional differences in height-age relationships (Table 4).
The Type B models which contained additional terms for latitude and elevation achieved a considerable improvement in fit over any of the Type A models (Table 4).
Results for the Type A models are fairly stable and indicate that DM is associated to a moderate drop in HRQOL.
Similar(53)
In almost all cases, these tests indicated that the Type B model performed best followed by the Type C model, with the Type A model invariably performing poorest (Table 8).
Agent X type-A model at time t1 cannot be equal to Agent X type-A model at time t2.
Model A X Model A YA(Y) 0. Agent X type-A model at time t1 cannot be equal to Agent Y type-A model at time t2. 4.
A system of intentions can be used to define a map from a type-A-model to type-B-model, and finally, there is SA of the type-A-model.
Thus emerges the four-part hypothesis [2]: 1. Model A(X) – Model A'(X) 0. Agent X type-A model at time t1 cannot be equal to Agent X type-A model at time t2. 2.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com