two weeks worth

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "two weeks worth" is not correct in standard written English; it should be "two weeks' worth." You can use it when referring to the quantity or amount of something that lasts for two weeks.
Example: "I bought two weeks' worth of groceries to ensure we have enough food for the entire period."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Two weeks' worth of money.

The New Yorker

It usually has only two weeks' worth of food.

Princeton University

He will forfeit two weeks' worth of his 2010 bonus.

The New York Times - Sports

Over a year, this could save two weeks – worth £1m – per plane.

Independent

Even then, two weeks worth of commonly prescribed antibiotics will kill the bacterium.

The New Yorker

More than two weeks' worth of days had been marked off.

The New York Times

And who has got two weeks worth of our interest," she asks?

The Guardian - Money

He has barely enough money on hand to run two weeks' worth of statewide advertising.

The New York Times

You were paid on commission and I made $69 for two weeks' worth of work.

The New York Times

Into these they are expected to stuff their two weeks' worth of garbage.

The New York Times

So, a microwave appeared and she home-cooked and froze two weeks' worth of hearty meals.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the grammatically correct form "two weeks' worth" in formal writing. This demonstrates attention to detail and credibility.

Common error

Avoid omitting the apostrophe in "two weeks' worth". The apostrophe indicates possession and is essential for grammatical correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "two weeks worth" (or, correctly, "two weeks' worth") functions as a noun phrase, often acting as an adjectival modifier to describe the quantity or amount of something. For example, "two weeks' worth of groceries."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

64%

Academia

10%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Wiki

6%

Science

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while "two weeks worth" is frequently used, it is grammatically incorrect; the correct form is "two weeks' worth". As highlighted by Ludwig AI, the phrase functions as a noun phrase specifying a quantity or duration, predominantly found in news and media sources. For professional and formal communication, ensure the apostrophe is included to maintain grammatical accuracy. Alternatives like "two weeks' supply" can also be used for similar meaning. This nuance in grammar enhances clarity and credibility in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

two weeks' supply

Emphasizes the amount needed for a two-week period and corrects the grammatical error.

a fortnight's supply

Uses "fortnight" as a synonym for two weeks and emphasizes the idea of a supply.

two weeks' portion

Emphasizes that the portion or amount is intended for a period of two weeks.

a two-week quantity

Focuses on the quantity, explicitly stating it's for a two-week duration.

supply lasting two weeks

Rephrases to emphasize the duration the supply is intended to cover.

two weeks allocation

Focuses on the amount allocated for two weeks, suggesting a planned distribution.

two weeks provision

Indicates a provision or stock that is sufficient for two weeks.

a period of two weeks' reserves

Highlights the concept of reserves being maintained for a two-week period.

bi-weekly allowance

Uses "bi-weekly" to imply a two-week frequency with the idea of an allowance or distribution.

fourteen days' portion

Breaks down "two weeks" into days while using "portion" to indicate a specific amount.

FAQs

What is the correct way to write "two weeks worth"?

The grammatically correct way to write it is "two weeks' worth". The apostrophe indicates that it is the worth of the two weeks.

Is it acceptable to use "two weeks worth" in informal writing?

While commonly used, "two weeks worth" is grammatically incorrect. For clarity and professionalism, it's best to use "two weeks' worth" even in informal contexts.

What can I use instead of "two weeks worth"?

You can use alternatives such as "two weeks' supply", "a fortnight's supply", or "two weeks' portion" depending on the context.

How does the meaning change if I use "two weeks' worth" instead of "two weeks worth"?

The meaning remains the same, but using "two weeks' worth" ensures grammatical accuracy, making your writing more professional and clear.