Sentence examples for two week evaluation from inspiring English sources

Square section suspension plates did not differ significantly from the controls in terms of colony diameter at the two week evaluation point, while both the 20 mesh and 30 mesh were significantly different from the control (P < 0.0001), but not from each other.

Ninety two out of the 100 GPs completed the four week evaluation of the fact sheets and returned the post-intervention survey.

To assess reproducibility, a sub-sample of stable patients (their clinical-severity not having changed at the six weeks evaluation) was identified.

Duration: eight weeks Evaluation tools: Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI), the functional living index: cancer (FLIC) and the patient's global evaluation (PGE).

Duration: six weeks Evaluation tools: the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17 item HAM-D), the Clinical and Patient's Global Impression scales (CGI and PGI), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating scale (HAM-A), the Functional Living Index for Cancer (FLIC), the Memorial Pain Assessment Card (MPAC) and the SF-36 Health Survey.

Two days later, the cells were exposed to DTIC or lexatumumab for two days (for evaluation of a short-term effect by the MTS assay) or for two weeks (for evaluation of a long-term effect by the clonogenic assay, where colonies were defined when they contained >50 cells).

Evaluation sessions took place four times a week (evaluation week), every other day.

Ninety two GPs completed the 4 week evaluation and eighty six (93%) of them used the fact sheets in their clinical practice and the majority (73%) perceived that they were a useful resource.

Also, a sub-sample of 101 of the community-based group was mailed the French ECOHIS a second time two weeks after initial evaluation (with follow-up telephone calls for those who had not returned this second evaluation), to enable the evaluation of test-retest reliability.

In a sub-sample of 101 of the community-based group, the scale was distributed a second time two weeks after initial evaluation.

In addition, participants included in the trial only received maximal antihypertensive therapy for two weeks prior to evaluation of efficacy, whilst a recommendation for at least two months is endorsed by current guidelines on hypertension, raising the possibility that patients with an incorrect diagnosis of resistant hypertension were included into the trial [ 43].