Sentence examples for two sets of institutions from inspiring English sources
Paul Frymer argues that as Democrats passed separate legislation to promote labor rights and racial equality they split the issues of class and race into two sets of institutions, neither of which had enough authority to integrate the labor movement.
Historically, societies governed by the rule of law have tended to be structured by capitalist markets, suggesting an affinity between the two sets of institutions.
Third, CBNRM relies on two sets of institutions: those that devolve rights (or not) from state and community and about which much is written (Murphree 2004; Nelson 2010), and those within a community that promote participation and equitable benefit sharing, which is an emerging challenge that has hardly been studied.
What's more, Paulson's argument fails to explain why the two sets of institutions weren't just treated differently, but radically differently, with draconian rules for one and lavish rescues with no consequences for the other.
There are, says Faizaan, two sets of Islamic institutions in Pakistan.
The two sets of democratic institutions are distinguished by basic features of direct participation: (1) direct democracy focuses on specific issues, in contrast to voting on candidates and general programs for long terms of office, and (2) citizens themselves act as decision makers rather than delegating these powers.
If one set of institutions fails, having other institutions that can pick up the slack is helpful.
Current market worries have depressed the shares of one set of institutions, big brokerage firms.
Mill worries about the transition from one set of institutions to another.
It was a protracted war between two peoples, two cultures, and two sets of political and religious institutions.
Reading these books in two sets of triads (cultures, communities, institutions: Mansfield Park, Villette, North and South; formation and vocation: Emma, Jane Eyre, Wives and Daughters), we will trace how these authors simultaneously invent and resist ideas about privacy, property, duty, subversion, gender identity and realism itself.
