This raises the question of just how these two relations are related to each other, and what makes them both species of the genus 'causation'causation
BSRs also support the concept of two relations being similar even when the elements that are related are dissimilar, as in the example above.
These two relations are commonly measured by asking students to name their friends, and this network is used to construct drinking exposure and peer status variables.
The two relations are different and it is shown that one can identify and separate these two interactions by analysing the recording of the aggregation.
Buber said these two relations are exhaustive.
These two relations are supposed to be trivial relations.
The two relations are logically similar in certain ways.
And these two relations are verifiable without any other conditions.
The two relations are clearly distinct from one another anyway since the entailment relation is — unlike the relation of logical consequence — asymmetrical and irreflexive.
The other two relations are distribution, where the two modes jointly construct similar content, and divergence, where the ideational content is opposed in the two.
The two relations are compatible, however: the same proposition may be at the same time deduced from and grounded in its premise.
