Sentence examples for two individual systems from inspiring English sources

Despite the large uncertainty ranges for the two individual systems, the special design of the paired experiment led to a reduced error of the differential effect, because very similar systematic errors for both parallel fields could be assumed.

It is imperative that future developments should consider an integrated design approach to improve the overall system autarky by communicating between the two individual systems, by considering synergistic energy-water production, by collaborating resources planning and energy-water infrastructure synergies supported by science and system-based natural resource policies and regulations.

Using the data set from the experiment with twelve trials [27], we demonstrate, as in other domain applications, that combination is positive (better than or equal to the best of the two individual systems) only if the two systems, based on weighted mean using confidence radius, are relatively good (higher performance ratio) and they are diverse (higher cognitive diversity).

We felt that a full discussion of the substrates of the two individual systems is beyond the scope of our manuscript.

In Table 2, it can be observed that all 2-combinations by intersection are positive cases, which means its performance is better than or equal to the best of the two individual systems.

The system assigns to each word the label that receives the most votes from the three individual systems (i.e. if at least two individual systems output the same label y for a given word x, y will be chosen as the final label for x).

This web of interconnected pathways is akin to the six degrees of separation that are said to separate any two individuals; systems that may seem unrelated share indirect, but functionally important, connections.

Six individual systems, which are the ones used in this paper, performed predictions started once per year instead of every 5 years.

This framework consists of three individual systems associated with one another, as demonstrated in Figure 1. Figure 1 Framework for affective interaction.

The six individual systems in order of performance according to average precision are: A = TRLocator, B = MACS, C = PeakSeq, D = QuEST, E = CisGenome, and F = SISSRs.

In our preliminary work, we analyzed the six individual systems according to three features, which include: tag count, p-value, and fold change (enrichment of ChIP tags compared to background control tags at the same genomic locus) [ 41].