Sentence examples for two inception from inspiring English sources

We distinguished two inception and five non-inception cohorts.

Two different approaches were used to recruit two inception cohorts of consecutive back pain patients aged ≤50 years newly referred to two university outpatient departments.

In two inception workshops, which took place in Teslic (23 and 24 February for Republika Srpska) and Sarajevo (27 and 28 February for the Federation of BiH) good practice examples werefrom municipalities included in the previous phase (Bileca, Laktasi, Novi Grad Sarajevo and Novi Travnik).

Alice earned 67% of its box office outside of the U.S. Time Warner studio Warner Bros. has the most films in the top 10 with three: Inception, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows and Clash of the Titans.

None of the inception cohorts addressed the question as to whether the significance determined whether a submitted paper was accepted or not, with the exception of one inception cohort [5] that found that "positive" trials were published significantly more rapidly after submission than "negative" trials.

The rate of publication of studies in the four inception cohorts ranged from 60%to93%3% for significant results and from 20% to 86% for non-significant results.

Phase One : Inception The initial phase of the work incorporated a review of provided programme documentation (hard and soft copies) and the annual work plans and reports.

The formal publication of statistically significant results (p < 0.05) could be compared with that of non-significant results in four inception cohort studies, one regulatory cohort study, 12 abstract cohort studies and two manuscript cohort studies.

Eight inception cohort studies were excluded because they did not provide data on the results of unpublished studies or did not examine the association between publication and study results [ 12, 13, 70- 75].

The pooled odds ratio for publication bias by statistical significance of results was 2.40 (95% CI: 1.18 to 4.88) for the four inception cohort studies, 1.62 (95% CI: 1.34 to 1.96) for the 12 abstract cohort studies, and 1.15 (95% CI: 0.64 to 2.10) for the two manuscript cohort studies.

In 1997, Dickersin combined the results from four inception cohort studies [ 26- 28, 31] and found that the pooled adjusted odds ratio for publication bias (publication of studies with significant or important results versus those with unimportant results) was 2.54 (95% CI: 1.44 to 4.47) [ 16].