two cost

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "two cost" is not correct in written English.
It seems to be a misunderstanding or a typo, as it does not convey a clear meaning. Example: "The total for the two cost items was higher than expected."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

Only two cost more than $30.

The New York Times - Food

The duck lunch for two cost $64.

The New York Times - Travel

Dinner for two cost 52,000 pesos.

The New York Times - Travel

These bounds apply for two cost measures.

Journal of Algorithms

Cottages sleeping two cost from £66 a night.

The Guardian - Travel

All but two cost more than the benefit cap.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

5 human-written examples

He said that Comprehensive NeuroScience resisted two cost-saving techniques.

The New York Times

The MIT team has come up with two cost-efficient depot designs that do not require such long-term commitment.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Two cost-saving options may work better than a fleet of shiny new Dell laptops.

Forbes

Only two cost-effectiveness analysis of IPTp-SP have been carried out alongside intervention studies [5], [6].

Plosone

To our knowledge, only two cost-effectiveness studies were published [ 6, 7].

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to the cost of two items, ensure clarity by specifying "the cost of the two" or "the two items cost."

Common error

Avoid using "two cost" as a standalone phrase. Clarify what the cost refers to (e.g., "the two items cost").

Linguistic Context

The phrase "two cost" is typically intended to describe the monetary value associated with a pair of items, services, or entities. However, as Ludwig indicates, the phrase is grammatically incorrect and needs restructuring for clarity. It often functions as a subject attempting to describe a monetary value.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "two cost" is grammatically incorrect and requires additional context to convey a clear meaning. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's not considered correct English. While the intention is usually to specify the price of two items or services, direct use should be avoided in formal writing. Examples found by Ludwig predominantly originate from news sources and scientific reports, but these examples do not endorse correctness, but usage. For clarity, restructuring the sentence to specify 'the two items cost' or 'the cost of the two' is recommended. Alternative phrases include "expense of two", "price for a pair", or "cost for both".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

cost for both

Emphasizes that the price covers two distinct items or services.

combined cost

Focuses on the total cost when two elements are considered together.

the amount for both

Indicates the sum total required for a pair of items or services.

expense of two

Changes the focus to the expense associated with two items or entities.

total charge for two

Refers to the entire amount charged when dealing with two units or individuals.

price for a pair

Specifies that the cost refers to a set of two items.

rate for a couple

Specifies the price applicable to two individuals, often used in services or accommodations.

what they bill for two

Expresses the cost as the amount that is invoiced for two items or services.

cost of the duo

Refers to the price associated with a pair considered as a unit.

dual pricing

Highlights the existence of two different prices, possibly for the same item under different conditions.

FAQs

How can I correctly phrase a sentence about the price of two items?

Instead of saying "two cost", you can say "the "two items cost"", "the price for the two is", or "the cost of both is" to ensure grammatical correctness.

Is it grammatically correct to say "two cost"?

No, "two cost" is not grammatically correct. It's better to say "the "two items cost"" or rephrase the sentence for clarity.

What is a more appropriate way to refer to the combined price of two things?

Consider using phrases like "the "total cost for both"", "the "combined price"", or "the "expense for two"" for better clarity and grammatical correctness.

When is it acceptable to use a phrase similar to "two cost"?

It's generally not advisable to use "two cost" directly. Always specify what the number 'two' refers to and restructure the sentence. For example: "The "two tickets cost" $20" is acceptable.