Two clusters, one on Chr.07 and the other on Chr.16, were particularly interesting.
The sequencing of the sorghum genome allowed the identification of 17 MIR169 gene copies, from which five were arranged in two clusters, one located on chr2 (sbi- MIR169f and sbi- MIR169g) and the other located on chr7 (sbi- MIR169l, sbi- MIR169m, and sbi- MIR169n, respectively (Paterson et al. 2009) (fig. 1 and table 1).
Phylogenetic analysis based on minicircle sequences reveals two clusters, one comprising isolates of type A and one of type B, while random amplification of polymorphic DNA show slight polymorphic bands within type B. Most T. evansi isolates analysed were heterozygous at a repetitive coding locus (MORF2).
A redundancy analysis based on microbial abundance profile demonstrated two clusters, one cluster with Babassu and Control treatments, and other cluster with Mofumbo, with some variables associated to dissimilarity between clusters.
M. fortuitum, on the other hand, had two clusters, one with three isolates of M. fortuitum 1 and the other with two isolates of M. fortuitum 2 subspecies.
Apply the K-means algorithm on GPR to cluster frames into two clusters, one with high GPR values and the other with low GPR values.
Apply the K-means algorithm on GPR to cluster frames into two clusters, one with high GPR values and the other with low GPR values. .
The core of the LOG-a-TEC testbed consists of a sensor network containing approximately 50 low-cost nodes mounted on public lighting infrastructure, distributed between two clusters: one in Logatec city center and the other in the industrial zone.
A cluster analysis on the wing shape abnormalities revealed two clusters: one cluster included Fukushima, Motomiya, and Hirono (FMH cluster), and the other cluster included Iwaki, Takahagi, and Tsukuba (ITT cluster).
The 5 different spacings for the NF-Y direct repeat were broken up into two clusters one turn apart, and therefore phased to be on the same side of the DNA double helix.
From Neighbor-Joining Cluster analysis based on TMA, TP and FRAP, Figure 5, it can be noticed two clusters, one cluster joining the jam formulations that maintain the highest levels of antioxidant parameters (Cluster I) and the second cluster revealing the formulations with largest loss of desired antioxidant properties (Cluster II).
