truth-apt

USAGE SUMMARY

'truth-apt' is a correct and usable word in written English.
You can use it as an adjective when describing something as being "likely to contain truth," or "able to express the truth." For example, you could say "The book was surprisingly truth-apt for a work of fiction."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

32 human-written examples

It is argued that design representations are not means for the production of truth-apt assertions.

Design Studies

Ayer denied that moral utterances were truth-apt.

SEP

Moral sentences are regarded as genuinely truth-apt.

SEP

The ethical domain is necessarily less truth-apt, which is not to say that it is not truth-apt at all. 15.

SEP

"It is wrong (wrt to B) to kill the innocent" is a truth-apt expression.

SEP

8. Propositional processes could just as well be called rationally sensitive, inferential, or truth-apt processes.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

28 human-written examples

Geoffrey Sayre-McCord, for example, thinks that moral realism consists of endorsing just two claims: that moral judgments are truth apt (cognitivism) and that they are often true (success theory).

SEP

Simple moral sentences may be truth apt if all there is to having truth conditions is to meet minimal requirements of having a meaningful use, being in the right mood, and combining grammatically with other sentences to yield more complex embeddings.

SEP

Thus, most contemporary ways of drawing the distinction between moral realism and moral anti-realism begin with linguistic distinctions: It is first asked "Is moral discourse assertoric?" or "Are moral judgments truth apt?" It is not clear that starting with linguistic matters is substantively at odds with seeing the realism/anti-realism distinction as a metaphysical division.

SEP

As in the story of the boy who cried wolf, however, the truth is apt to be disbelieved.

TechCrunch

If one accepts the plausible view that statements concerning legal rights, obligations, and statuses, can be truth-value apt, we seem to have a dialetheia.

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "truth-apt", ensure the context involves a discussion of semantics, epistemology, or metaethics, as it is a term primarily employed within these philosophical domains.

Common error

Avoid using "truth-apt" in general or informal writing. It is a technical term; using it outside of relevant academic or philosophical discussions can sound pretentious or confusing.

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "truth-apt" is as an adjective. It modifies nouns (typically "statements", "propositions", or "judgments") to indicate their capacity for being either true or false. As Ludwig AI confirms, the term is usable and correct. Ludwig's examples showcase its use in describing assertions and expressions within philosophical contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

70%

Encyclopedias

15%

News & Media

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "truth-apt" is a technical adjective used primarily in philosophy to describe statements or propositions that are capable of being either true or false. Ludwig AI confirms it as a correct and usable term. As the Ludwig examples show, it is prevalent in philosophical and academic discussions, particularly in fields like metaethics and epistemology. When writing, use "truth-apt" judiciously within appropriate contexts and avoid its application in general or informal writing as you can see from the usage analysis. You can replace "truth-apt" in favor of options like "capable of being true", "susceptible to truth", or "truth-conditional" in order to adjust the tone and context of your writing. You can use the word only if sentences express propositions or have substantial truth conditions, in all other ways you should not use them.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

truth-valuable

Indicates that something can be assigned a truth value.

capable of being true

Focuses on the inherent possibility of truthfulness.

apt to be true

Suggests a natural tendency towards truthfulness.

susceptible to truth

Highlights the vulnerability to being either true or false.

truth-conditional

Emphasizes the existence of specific conditions under which something is true.

amenable to truth evaluation

Emphasizes the suitability for assessing truth.

verifiable

Stresses the ability to confirm or prove the truth.

falsifiable

Highlights that the statement can be proven false.

fact-stating

Highlights the statement is presenting a fact.

assertoric

Related to the nature of making assertions, which are typically truth-apt.

FAQs

What does "truth-apt" mean?

"Truth-apt" describes something, typically a statement or proposition, that is capable of being either true or false. It's often used in philosophy to discuss whether certain types of claims, like moral judgments, can be considered "capable of being true" or false.

How is "truth-apt" used in philosophy?

In philosophy, "truth-apt" is used to determine whether certain statements can be assessed for their truth value. For example, metaethical debates often revolve around whether moral statements are "truth-apt", with cognitivists arguing they are, and expressivists often denying it. Realists and error-theorists agree that sentences are "capable of being true".

What is an example of a statement that is not "truth-apt"?

Imperatives (commands) and interrogatives (questions) are generally considered not "truth-apt" because they don't assert something that can be true or false. For example, "Close the door!" or "What time is it?" are not "capable of being true" or false.

Are moral judgments "truth-apt"?

Whether moral judgments are "truth-apt" is a central question in metaethics. Some theories, like moral realism, claim that moral statements are "truth-apt" and can be objectively true or false. Other theories, like expressivism, deny that moral statements are "truth-apt", arguing they express emotions or attitudes rather than beliefs about objective facts. Alternative ways to express that moral judgments can be assessed for their truth value is saying they are "amenable to truth evaluation".