Cultural transmission of trust from the home country is important in explaining trust levels in the United States, and somewhat less important in Australia.
Specifically, cultural transmission is particularly important in explaining trust levels in the United States, although a positive relationship between trust in the home country and individual trust can also be detected in Australia.
The community of voices that they trust have no interest in explaining the conclusions of the scientists, the humanity of the president, or the fresh hell that TARP and the stimulus helped to prevent, and no other voices can penetrate the protective walls they have built for themselves.
Having ties to a company that investors know well goes a long way in explaining their trust.
Second, organizational trust is believed to be important in explaining the causal relation between noneconomic and economic integration.
The theory of trust and distrust, put forward by the Danish philosopher Løgstrup [ 42], seems helpful in explaining why.
As Brian Lomax, the pioneer and doyen of the supporters trust' movement, explained in an interview with Jim Keoghan last year, "It was clear as the financial crisis deepened and time passed that there was no one coming along to save us, no white knight charging to our rescue.
Context-related characteristics, in particular trust in communication partners, explain the willingness to share and, consequently, the use of wireless grids.
"He suggested taking whatever the offer is because they've never seen me and they will be putting trust in me," Azharullah explained.
