But as true testimony by formerly enslaved people, it stood alone, Gates argues, as an indictment of "both those who enslaved them and the metaphysical system drawn upon to justify their enslavement".
(The argument here depends on an illicit assimilation of harming with wronging: the witness certainly harms the murderer by his true testimony, assuming that it leads to his conviction and execution, but there is no reason to agree that in giving that testimony the witness wrongs the murderer).
The contrast between the money spent among the country's domestic clubs and money invested in youth development is the truest testimony to the priorities of the modern England fan, and the national federation that is employed to represent them.
Incidentally, the second version copied from the original, rather than direct observation is the only true extant testimony to Hawkwood's appearance.
The same holds true of verbal testimony.
That seems to be holding true in the testimony of Mr. Fastow.
Before combat each participant swore that his case was just and his testimony true and that he carried no weapons other than the stipulated ones and no magical aids.
In struggling stages, he did so, merging light and substance — Impressionist immediacy and the density of matter — by being rigorously true to the testimony of eyesight, such as the different angles, and thus the very slightly different worlds, of vision from the right eye and the left.
The "true purpose" of testimony by Koufax and two other proposed defense witnesses, including Robert M. Morgenthau, the former Manhattan district attorney, "is to suggest to the jury that Saul Katz and Fred Wilpon are 'good guys' who would not turn a blind eye to fraud," the trustee said in his filing.
In struggling stages, he did so, merging light and substance Impressionist immediacy and the density of matter by being rigorously true to the testimony of eyesight, such as the different angles, and thus the very slightly different worlds, of vision from the right eye and the left.
Given that there is no DNA or forensic evidence of any kind linking Juárez to the crime, prosecutors argue in court papers, "The confession is key to the case; defendant cannot be convicted absent a finding that the statements to police and prosecutors were both voluntary and true, and Robles' testimony is highly relevant and material as well as critical or necessary to that issue".
