"tripartite agreement" is correct and is often used in written English.
You would typically use it when referring to an agreement between three different parties. For example, "The tripartite agreement between the government, company, and union will ensure fair labour practices."
There is no tripartite agreement.
True, this principle was underlined in the Tripartite Agreement of 1947, when India gained independence.
It's now a tripartite agreement -- Israel, of course, the Palestinian Authority and the Palestinian groups, Fatah, Hamas and Islamic Jihad.
Elliott is correct in calling for the chancellor to rethink the tripartite agreement that has so obviously failed.
An accompanying tripartite agreement between Britain, France, and Italy defined extensive spheres of influence for the latter two powers.
In 2013, Kenya, Somalia and the UNHCR signed a tripartite agreement in which all parties committed themselves to the principle of voluntary return.
In Ireland, despite a tradition of tripartite agreements from the 1980s on, discussions turned contentious when conditions turned sour.
3In particular, reported reforms also encompass framework agreements among social partners, social pacts and tripartite agreements involving government, trade unions, and employers' federations.
The time evolution of measures affecting wage setting, previously highlighted for the whole domain of wage setting frameworks (including also social pacts and tripartite agreements), is even clearer when focusing exclusively on government intervention aimed at reforming the wage setting system (Fig. 9).
When the tripartite agreements were signed, the Belgian Government said that it had serious questions about the compatibility of this agreement with the Schengen Convention and the principle of free movement of people enshrined in various European Treaties.
In February 2007, tripartite agreements were signed between the 21 organizations and the MoLSS and UNICEF for a duration of 3 years, starting implementation thereafter.
