This idea is conceptually evaluated using a specific TRIZ methodology with four inventive thinking processes: "define," "solve," "design," and "implement".
We've seen many companies achieve impressive results using a method we call systematic inventive thinking.
This study depicts a conceptual service design framework, called design-oriented systematic inventive thinking (DSIT) approach, which can be applied in different problem contexts.
This paper discusses four tools that fit in the engineers' toolkit to approach these multidisciplinary problems: TRIZ, Systematic Inventive Thinking, Quality Function Deployment and FunKey Architecting.
The contents are based on the TRIZ methodology but have been further reorganized and unified into USIT (Unified Structured Inventive Thinking) for easier to learn and apply.
I went looking for the biking equivalent of clever subway apps like Exit Strategy or EmbarkNYC, and was surprised at how little inventive thinking I found.
But with a packed curriculum, exam pressures and limited resources, inventive thinking is crucial to getting students moving.
This process of "systematic inventive thinking," which evolved from the work of the Russian engineer and scientist Genrich Altschuller, creates "pre-inventive" ideas that then can be expanded into innovations.
Unlike most new product development methods, systematic inventive thinking starts with an existing product and its characteristics rather than customers and their unmet needs.
Systematic inventive thinking is based on the research of Genrich S. Altshuller, a Russian engineer who spent his professional life working to formalize the creative process.
This paper presents a structured application of TRIZ and USIT (Unified Structured Inventive Thinking) to generate concept solutions for an in-service diagnostic system for a synchronous belt drive system for an automotive application.
