Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(17)
Those large trials which did not support differences in mortality or renal injury between synthetic colloids and crystalloids, namely, those by Bagshaw et al. and Annane et al. [6],[10], compared HES to NS.
We also analyzed separately the two trials which did not use ganciclovir prophylaxis as control.
We compared the citation impact of clinical trials which made their cancer microarray data publicly available to the citation impact of trials which did not.
This notion has been confirmed in two recent efficacy trials, which did not demonstrate increased HIV acquisition in women using PRO 2000 [52], [52].
These subtle in vitro changes are in contrast to the results from clinical trials which did not show any safety concerns as determined by self reports or colposcopic measurements [19], [20].
Using this method we found that in both frontal (figure 4a) and parietal (figure 4b) leads, ERP activities in response to partial report (PR) trials, which needed irrelevancy elimination, dissociated from ERP activities in response to whole report (WR) trials, which did not require any irrelevancy elimination.
Similar(43)
We found that cancer clinical trials which share their microarray data were cited about 70% more frequently than clinical trials which do not.
Full data are shown in Table 2. Adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios comparing each arm with the best and worst arms (AQ+AS and SP respectively) are shown in Table 3. Relative risks are also shown for comparison with trials which do not use OR.
This can further ensure the dose to be employed in clinical trials, which do not cause fatality in the subsequent studies.
This is demonstrated in Figure 5, which shows the expected loss in power for trials which do not account for ignorable clustering in the trial (given the trial is powered at 80%).
On the other hand, if the IFC performs an inhibitory function, then activation in this region should be greater in no-go trials, which require inhibition of the index finger response, relative to double trials, which do not.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com