Sentence examples for trials of responsibility from inspiring English sources

The first part of the film, called "Nuremberg and the Germans," focusses on denial — on the denial, at the Nuremberg trials, of responsibility on the part of officials, most of whom were in fact convicted of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and on the ongoing denial by many Germans, at the time of the filming, of responsibility for the crimes committed by Germans under the Nazi regime.

The first part of the film, called "Nuremberg and the Germans," focusses on denial on the denial, at the Nuremberg trials, of responsibility on the part of officials, most of whom were in fact convicted of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and on the ongoing denial by many Germans, at the time of the filming, of responsibility for the crimes committed by Germans under the Nazi regime.

The generals were absolved of responsibility at trial in a civil suit in 2000 brought by the relatives of four American churchwomen who were raped and killed by the military in 1980.

That trial will help determine the level of responsibility for the disaster, and could result in even greater fines for BP.

A second trial, in New Jersey this month, absolved Merck of responsibility for causing a heart attack in a 60-year-old Voixx user.

Louise Ure took up the theme in her first novel, "Forcing Amaryllis," in which a trial consultant with a heightened sense of responsibility for her younger sister resolves to kill the man who raped the girl.

This is evident in his attempt to escape capture after the war (he was on the run for about 15 years before he was brought to justice), in his denial of responsibility during his trial, and in his unsuccessful appeal against the death sentence.

Tour operator Thomas Cook was cleared of responsibility at a trial in Greece in 2010.

Thomas Cook was cleared of responsibility at a trial in Greece in 2010 and awarded damages against the hotel's owner.

Thomas Cook was cleared of responsibility at a trial in Greece in 2010 and was awarded damages against the hotel's owner.

Canvin and colleagues speculate that the sense of responsibility surrounding the trial decisions of parents of children with epilepsy was eased by the voluntary and reversible nature of the decision [ 14].