Figure 6B shows the resulting grand mean traces reflecting 500 random draws from the available correct T1 trials for each participant, balancing the number of neutral and emotional T2s within individuals and conditions.
Trials that adjusted for balancing factors in the analysis were more likely to show a statistically significant result, potentially because of the increased power owing to adjustment.
In 18 trials, balanced for order across animals, each animal underwent all possible combinations of feeding area step (3 levels: 0, 10, and 20 cm) and of difference in height between feed table and standing area of forelegs (6 levels: 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 cm).
9 12 We found the number of trials balancing for centre and prognostic factors to be similar to that reported previously.
Numbers of trials were balanced for successful and unsuccessful encoding.
For the duration of the trial, participants were allowed to place the fingertips of one hand on the wall for balance.
Three out of 4 trials that compared postintervention balance scores with baseline assessment concluded significant improvement results in the VR group for balance as measured by means of the BBS.
