Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The validity of the spatial cue is manipulated in order to measure the disengagement and move operations (see [33], [34]. Specifically, 75% of the 48 spatial cues (36 trials) are valid and 25% (12 trials) are invalid.
Similar(56)
Seventy-five percent of these trials were valid trials, in which the target appeared in the target-colored placeholder, and 25% were invalid trials, in which the target appeared in the distractor-colored placeholder.
In the potential payoff manipulation, half of the bias trials were valid, i.e., cue and stimulus direction were consistent, and a large reward (eight points) was received for a correct response.
In the prior probability manipulation, 80%% of the bias trials were valid (i.e., in 32 of the 40 trials the direction indicated by the cue was consistent with the direction of the stimulus) and 20%% of the bias trials were invalid (i.e., in 8 of the 40 trials, cue and stimulus direction were inconsistent).
A trial was valid if the limbs had made contact with the surface of the walkway at least two times, without the dog turning the head.
The inclusion and exclusion criteria play an important role in that they specify the characteristics of the sample population under study and therefore the results and conclusions of the clinical trial is valid only to the extent that this sample group represents the entire population for which a potential treatment or drug is targeted.
Although the methods have been presented in the context of a multi-center clinical trial, they are valid in the planning of a single-center clinical trial.
Although cluster randomized controlled trials are considered valid studies, their methodological limitations should be addressed.
If the outcome measures used in clinical trials are not valid, the results of the trials themselves are questionable.
ACR/EULAR definitions of remission developed for trials are similarly valid in observational studies in RA and could be used in practice.
First and foremost, the non-disease specificity of the symptoms has made ovarian cancer very difficult to detect in time and, although clinical trials are ongoing, valid screening programmes are not yet available [ 4].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com