Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(21)
There were some statistical issues relating to how the crossover design trial was evaluated.
The methodological quality of each trial was evaluated based on a standardized system.
The trial was evaluated through a representative household survey at baseline and after one year.
The only randomized intervention trial was evaluated separately (8).
One trial was evaluated as high risk of bias and one as unclear.
Change in admission frequency over the 24-month trial was evaluated using repeated-measures Poisson regression.
Similar(39)
Both the preclinical neuroprotection portfolio cited to justify a clinical trial and the design and conduct of that clinical trial were evaluated using modern standards that include the Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines.
All patients included in the trial were evaluated according to intent-to-treat analysis.
The first 2,000 patients participating in the AMAROS trial were evaluated.
The 60 subjects who completed the trial were evaluated for efficacy parameters.
Patients of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Internistische Onkologie (AIO) KRK-0104 and the Mannheim rectal cancer trial were evaluated.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com