Suggestions(1)
Exact(6)
If stabilization was impossible within 10 s after the presentation of the target, the trial was counted as a failure.
If stabilization was impossible within 10 s after the beginning of a trial, this trial was counted as a failure.
If the cursor was on the correct side of the screen, the trial was counted as "hit", and as "missed" otherwise.
The fixation point was defined as that point at which head-turn velocity fell below 20°/s for at least 150 ms. If the owl fixated the target position shorter, or if it had response latencies (the time between trial initiation and onset of the head-turn) of less than 50 ms or more than 500 ms, the trial was counted as an error.
A trial was counted as correct only if both final circle positions were identified correctly.
The number of apoptotic cells of the first animal trial was counted to evaluate the in vivo cisplatin chemosensitisation effect after Ad-NBS1 gene transfer.
Similar(54)
Responses for each trial were counted as indicating 'Plaid' motion if the response was in the intersection-of-constraints direction, for example up and to the left when the two components drifted upwards and leftwards respectively.
If they do not succeed within this period, the trial is counted as unsuccessful, and the next trial starts.
To estimate performance without a guessing component, we can also calculate performance in the manner of Experiment 1, where trials were counted as correct only if observers made a correct response within 2 s after the target changed its state.
All neurons that spiked within the first 1000 ms in at least 75 percent of the trials were counted; this quantity indicates the number of neurons that are driven to spike reliably in the chain and is called the size.
Failed trials were counted for each condition.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com