Sentence examples for trial to know from inspiring English sources

Mr. Wali's American advisers smiled uncomfortably as he explained in an interview that he did not need a trial to know who deserved a beating.

And for those thousands or dozens — or maybe just two or three — who find themselves in the pages, well, it doesn't take a randomized controlled trial to know that the book will be a great read, no matter what anyone else says.

I'll wait until the end of the free trial to know for sure.

One crude way to understand impact evaluations is to think of them as a medical trial: to know whether a new pill works, you select two groups of people at random, one takes the pill ("the treatment", in technical parlance) and the other doesn't (they are the "control group").

The same conditions as Block 3 were used, but type of judgment was also randomized across all trials; therefore, the participants were required to pay attention to the reminder screen for each trial to know which judgment to make.

But it will take more testing, involving larger numbers of patients in randomized trials, to know if the device can live up to its potential, the team wrote in their report.

But it will take years of research and clinical trials to know for sure, and she warned against the notion that pot is a panacea for the opioid epidemic.

Using insecticides to reduce phlebotomine sandfly numbers may be effective at reducing the incidence of CL, but there is insufficient evidence from trials to know whether it is better to spray the internal walls of houses or to treat bednets, curtains, bedsheets or clothing.

Despite the attractiveness of using a pure aquaretic agent to correct life-threatening hyponatremia, insufficient data are available from clinical trials to know if sufficiently rapid correction can be achieved in patients with acute, severe hyponatremia without the use of hypertonic saline.

And of course, we have no trial record to know whether the recount could be done in that time.

How is the trial judge to know whether the expert is merely speculating, or whether the evidence on which the expert bases his or her testimony is sufficient to support the conclusion?