Sentence examples for trial rendered from inspiring English sources

On Oct. 1, 1946 — exactly 65 years ago — the justices overseeing the trial rendered their verdict.

This cannot be taken as an indication of equivalence since the limited size of this trial rendered it unable to exclude a 19% lower progression-free survival and survival in those treated with single agent carboplatin which would be important clinically.

"… methodological issues (i.e., sample attrition and exposure to the intervention in the control group) [emphasis added] of a recent randomized, controlled trial rendered its findings inconclusive (MacMillan et al., 2009)…" [ 52], p. 6. Notable in the second extraction is the statement that the control group was exposed to the intervention even though no control women were screened.

9 20 21 There are important differences in the population enrolled and the rehabilitation approach taken in the current trial, rendering comparison with these previous studies difficult.

However, the lack of prospective validation of this concept in the setting of an appropriate clinical trial renders its clinical application difficult.

Thus, sustained improvement of symptoms, such as pain in the placebo group with increasing duration of the trial, renders it difficult to show superiority of the active drug over placebo.

Also, the exclusion of the VELOUR trial renders the results of this meta-analysis incomplete and prone to misinterpretation, although the authors conclude that the use of aflibercept remains justified in its approved indication in patients with mCRC.

Correction: June 24 , 2004 Thursday Because of a telephone transcription error, an article in Business Day yesterday about a planned meeting between two medical groups and some Democratic Senate staff members to discuss the possibility of a national database of clinical drug trials rendered a word incorrectly in a quotation from Dr. David Fassler, a trustee of the American Psychiatric Association.

Differences in trial design, intervention, and outcome, and the inclusion of fewer than ten trials rendered it not helpful to produce a funnel plot to visualize potential publication bias [20,34].

The objective of our study was to use a diverse sample of medical interventions to assess empirically whether first trials rendered substantially different treatment effect estimates than reliable, high-quality bodies of evidence.

A statistician was identified in only 27% of the trials, rendering the analysis of the data questionable.