Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(29)
The present research compares randomly selected 20-year-old men who took part in a scientific trial (efficacy) with those who voluntarily sought an intervention (effectiveness).
This paper reports on the baseline variables of the first 1000 participants randomized, the design, and proposed analysis of the randomized two-arm clinical trial "Efficacy of a Tobacco Quit Line in the Military".
To collect data on the real-world effectiveness of collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) during its first year of use following U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval and compare those results with clinical trial efficacy data.
In the clinical trial, efficacy assessments were obtained at baseline and at weekly intervals, for up to 6-weeks, with the primary efficacy endpoint being a mean change in MADRS total score (∆MADRS) from baseline to 6-weeks (Loebel et al. 2014b).
Normal distribution was used for the original trial efficacy data and rates of events combined with the observed cost estimates.
It is important to recognise that there is likely to be a gap between trial efficacy and programmatic effectiveness for multi-day regimens.
Similar(31)
The inputed MTCT probabilities reflect findings from various trial data, implying that program effectiveness equals trial efficacies.
In the 12-week, active-controlled trials, efficacy was also assessed at day 2 (Table 1).
Uremia represents a state where hyperhomocysteinemia is resistant to folate therapy, thus undermining intervention trials' efficacy.
It was underpinned by the results of a high quality randomized trial [ 2], US cost data from the Medicare files [ 15, 16], caregiver cost and utility data from US studies of patients with macular degeneration [ 17, 18], and explicit assumptions about dosing regimens and post-trial efficacy.
Clinical trials (efficacy) or meta-analyses of clinical trials are the preferred sources of outcome data in six agencies [ 7, 19, 21, 25, 30, 35].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com