Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
One crow in the innovation group stared at the setup for less than 2 minutes and then performed the whole trial correctly on her very first attempt.
However, when a large percentage of subjects receive effective supportive care, the three-arm trial correctly shows that mortality rates for A and C are similar.
Under the transitive fallacy, one would incorrectly conclude that the cancer mortality rates for A and C are similar at the time of the second trial However, when 70% of the subjects receive the new therapy, the three-arm trial correctly shows that A is substantially better than C. Cancer treatment with improved supportive care A second hypothetical example involves treatment for gastric cancer.
Similar(57)
These were that the trial was run correctly, doses of the drug were given as they were supposed to have been, and there was no contamination during manufacturing.
Participants had to complete all eight practice trials correctly to move on to test trials; if not, the program recycled until all practice trials were completed successfully.
Performance is scored as the number of trials correctly identified.
Performance is quantified as the total number of trials correctly completed.
The criterion employed was that the patient had to answer five consecutive trials correctly.
This mapping was learned prior to scanning and practiced until the participant had responded to 5 consecutive trials correctly.
After an initial assessment of all experimental trials receiving a correct response within 2500 ms, only trials correctly responded within 300 1600 ms were analyzed.
The results for the four conditions separately are as follows: Condition A. Both elephants performed the task significantly better than the chance in the first block (the first 5 days): Authai performed 66% of trials correctly (binomial test: P = 0.0328), while Surya completed 80% of trials correctly (binomial test: P < 0.0001) and thus had reached the criterion in the first block.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com