Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The trend profile of visual acuity showed no significant difference between the two groups.
Similar(59)
It identified social trends (60 trend profiles) and derived social challenges (seven topic areas) [3].
Annual trend profiles for inpatient mortality and non-elective readmission within 30 days were plotted.
To examine differences in the changes of parameters over time, trend profiles were determined by repeated measures analysis.
Annual trend profiles were created for the grouped ICD-10 diagnostic codes from January 2005 to March 2013 to determine coding reliability and shifts (see online supplementary appendix 2).
On the other hand, visual acuity and macular sensitivity showed similar trend profiles after IVTA regardless of the presence or absence of SRD.
The trend profiles of macular thickness within the 10° and 20° fields of the occluded region showed significant differences, but there were no significant differences with respect to the trend profiles of visual acuity and macular sensitivity within the central 4° field and the 10° and 20° fields of the occluded region.
31 NY and IL had similar trend profiles and an overall decline in FRF rates, but the Brady scores were 62 and 35 9 with 10 and 8 policies preventing illegal firearm trafficking, respectively.
There were also no significant between-group differences with regard to the trend profiles of macular sensitivity within the central 4° field or within the 10° and 20° fields of the occluded and non-occluded regions.
Plotting annual trend profiles of the data allowed us to choose a suitable temporal range to develop the model, as well as account for any change in coding practices over time.
There were no significant differences between the SRD group and the SRD group with regard to the trend profiles of macular thickness within the central 4° field or within the 10° and 20° fields of the non-occluded region.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com