Sentence examples for treatments values from inspiring English sources

A good agreement was observed between the temperatures estimated by numerical simulation and temperatures measured by a thermocouple in the treatment zone before and after the PEF treatments (values of RMSE below 3%).

By encapsulating melting and hot pressing, this value is reduced down to 12 20 μΩ m [41], while after SPS treatments, values close to 15 μΩ m were reported [35].

Considering the chronic effects of N. sativa treatments (values after 24 h) and the lack of difference between treated groups' cytokines, the following hypothesis may be proposed.

Each column represents a separate biological replicate (n = 4 for the controls and n = 2 for each of the three RNAi treatments); values were normalized for total protein concentrations in the extracts.

Importantly, the drug treatments were well tolerated and non-toxic to the mice, as weight gain and all other physiological parameters (i.e., liver, kidney, spleen and uterine weight) were in the normal range (data not shown) and no hepatotoxicity was observed as alanine aminotransferase activity was not elevated following any of the drug treatments (values ranged between 23 and 27 IU l−1).

Under both treatments, values were significantly different from the 25%% value expected with an even use of all trays (one-sample-t-test, without/with shrews: T = 5.85, p = 0.010/ T = 5.62, p = 0.001; Fig.  3b) There was no difference in the concentration of effort between seasons (Mann–Whitney test, Z = −0.568, p = 0.570).

Although species richness values from the restoration treatment did not show differences in relation to those from the forest treatment, values for the reforestation treatment did.

Another reported the means and standard deviation of the 'baseline' and 'end of treatment' values of the different intervention groups, as well as the 'difference of differences' between the two intervention groups (Muniyappa et al., 2008).

One trial presented the means and standard deviation of 'baseline' and 'end of treatment' values of the two study groups, as well as the change from baseline (with standard deviations) in the two groups (Crews et al., 2008).

The predictors' pre-treatment values for the strongly treated states resemble the pre-treatment values of the synthetic control group (column 3) much more than the pre-treatment values for the full set of control states (column 4 ).

The maximum of the post-treatment values was used for the analyses.