Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(13)
Recidivists however, were almost three times less likely to have the treatment item as a 'met' need compared to non-recidivists although this finding was non-significant (χ 2(1) = 3.87, p = 0.05).
Six items specifically address: satisfaction with current treatment (item 1), treatment convenience (item 4), flexibility of treatment (item 5), understanding of diabetes (item 6), recommending treatment (item 7) and continuing treatment (item 8).
We attempted to assess the reporting of patient treatment (item 3, Table 1).
As for the specific DTSQ items, satisfaction with current treatment (item 1), treatment understanding (item 6), treatment recommendation (item 7) and continuing treatment (item 8), were the most strongly associated with the SF-36 scales.
The item on doctors' warnings on side effects of treatment (item 22) had a very low weighted kappa (k = 0.17).
Clinical activity included treatment item codes, which indicated the performer of the treatment (dental student or dental hygiene-therapy student).
Similar(47)
Secondly, the figures for individual treatment items together with the GOZ analysis permit in-depth secondary statistical evaluations.
Treatment items were aggregated and were without time-related information.
These analyses generated the final FertiQoL, which composed 24 core items, plus 10 optional treatment items).
The 10 optional treatment items were conceptualized as indexing treatment environment and treatment tolerability.
Similar proportions for tests and treatment items were smaller in magnitude (table 6).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com