Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
It is 1.06 times better than EMPIRIC TREATMENT (priority score 20.7%), 1.12 times better than CULTURE (priority score 19.6%), 1.16 times better than RAPID STREP (priority score 18.9%) and 1.17 times better than NO TEST, NO TREAT (priority score 18.8%).
These two options are 1.03 times better than NO TEST NO TREAT (priority score 20.2%), 1.06 times better than RAPID STREP (priority score 19.7%), and 1.14 times better than EMPIRIC TREATMENT (priority score 18.4%).
This option is 1.02 times better than CULTURE (priority score 20.5%), 1.04 times better than NO TEST, NO TREAT (priority score 20.2%), 1.06 times better than EMPIRIC TREATMENT (priority score 19.8%), and 1.13 times better than RAPID STREP (priority score 18.6%).
Similar(57)
Conversely, CMHCs with abundant resources have the capacity to treat both priority groups (high and low) within required time limits and for this reason classify both groups as high priority.
It was not acceptable that the bank's management tended to treat these priority issues as afterthoughts, it added.
CMHCs with scarce resources (budgets) may not have the capacity to treat low priority patients and, for this reason, classify them as refusals.
We were given a new call out time - the next day, some time between 8am and 12pm, but were told we could not be made a priority as all calls are treated as priority.
This should hold true because, in both models, the physician will treat all high priority before low priority patients and delegates will only treat low priority patients.
This may explain why the two men were not treated as priority targets by French counter-terrorism agencies.
They also said that in the months leading up to Wednesday's attack, the men were not treated as priority targets by French counter-terrorism agencies.
Those who meet pre-diabetics but exclusion criteria are treated as priority intervention group.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com