Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
In addition, trap type, trap density and study duration may influence trapping success [43, 44].
Relative and absolute measures of predictive strength for environmental factors that managers could potentially manipulate were low, suggesting that opportunities to improve trapping success by manipulating factors that affect rates of encounter, entry, and retention are limited.
We first tested how strongly seasonal patterns in daily trap catches (a measure of trapping success) were related to nightly rates of trap encounter, entry, and retention (outcomes of sea lamprey behavior).
In order to assess the potential impact of the trap design on the trapping success, we compared the efficiency of opaque and white (more translucent) emergence traps and two trap shapes (cone-shaped and quadratic), to sample Culicoides emerging from cowpats.
We found that the trapping success in these sites was higher than in natural areas.
During a total of 15,145 trap-nights, 362 rodents (trapping success rate 2.4%) belonging to 14 species were captured.
Similar(50)
The overall trap success and relative proportion of Mus spp. in the trapped population both varied across the five zones of the study site (Table 2).
Mammal research is often quite labor-intensive because of low trap success rates in the tropics.
Our trap success rate at Jicotea was much better than at Catie.
In the tropics, trap success rate is typically about 1 percent for coffee habitats and 3 percent for forest.
We captured a total of 54 small mammals, 13 of them recaptures, yielding a trap success rate of 2.53 percent.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com