Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Transverse presentation, which occurs only once in several hundred labours, requires turning of the fetus before vaginal delivery or else delivery by cesarean section.
Among the fetuses: 559 had cephalic presentation (78.5%), 133 had breech presentation (18.7%), 20 had transverse presentation (2.8%) and 17 did not have the information provided.
In our study, the mothers of fetuses with transverse presentation had a higher percentage for the perception of DFM, but this difference was not statistically significant.
The factors significantly associated with vaginal delivery were monthly family income below 5-fold the Brazilian minimum monthly wage, reliance on the Brazilian national health system for healthcare, low maternal age, and first cesarean section indicated because of fetal breech or transverse presentation, or twin pregnancy [ 9].
Similar(56)
NCP includes breech, oblique and transverse presentations.
Maternal factors associated with an increased ECV success include higher parity [ 32, 33], transverse-oblique presentations, posterior placenta [ 32], low uterine tone, non-frank breech presentations [ 33, 34] and non-engagement of the presenting part [ 35].
Some of the non recurring indications for caesarean section are: poor labour progress, foetal distress, placenta previa, transverse lie, breech presentation, oblique lie, pregnancy induced hypertension and twins [ 5].
For example, group 9 (transverse lie) presented large differences in the total number of pregnancies between the years, indicating that this presentation was underreported during some time periods.
Face presentation and transverse (cross) presentation are rare.
To demonstrate a rare and unusual presentation of transverse vaginal septum (TVS).
Inclusion criteria were scheduled ECV, breech presentation or transverse lie, singleton gestation, gestational age ≥ 36 weeks, intact membranes, non-anomalous fetus and reassuring fetal status on cardiotocogram.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com