"translation quality" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to the standard of a translation, for example: "This translation company guarantees high translation quality for all its services".
The translated questionnaire was back-translated to validate the translation quality.
We consider the linguistic correctness of the translation and the fidelity of the translated content are appropriate for this evaluation of the translation quality.
These models are capable of handling very large vocabularies without compromising on translation quality.
The results indicate that not all culture specific items are appropriately rendered into the target language, which is a significant factor in the evaluation of translation quality.
For this task, we hypothesize that the translation quality can be improved by adapting a machine translation system to the domain of the ontology.
In addition, the impacts of the proposed features on the translation quality have been analyzed, and the most positive ones have been recognized.
The questionnaire was translated from English into Bulgarian, Croatian and Romanian, with a 'back-translation' quality check.
Most of the currently available language versions were translated following international standards for linguistic and cultural translation of quality of life scales.
The currently available 9 language versions have been translated following international standards for the linguistic and cultural translation of quality of life scales.
The most obvious potential liability of crowd-sourced translation is quality control.
John Lloyd Wynne, Welsh translation and quality manager, customer contact directorate, HM Revenue and Customs, Cardiff.
