Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
26 40 Actual (transitory) household income had no effect on any of the analysed health check-ups and averaged (permanent) household income had a significant influence only on the uptake for dental screening and eyesight tests.
Similar(59)
About 24% of the households are categorized as transitory food insecure households based on DDS.
Studies that are based on single indicator would have characterized the transitory food secured households as food secure household when in reality, they are not.
Results also suggest that 18% of the sample could be classified as transitory food insecure households when FOODexp was used as an indicator.
47 Therefore, our analysis compares how past screening behaviour, individual and household characteristics, transitory and permanent household income affect uptake of these different health check-ups.
The implication of this is that about 24 and 18% of the households are transitory food insecure.
Economic growth in turn raises per capita income and protects households from transitory negative shocks, while investment in homes (among other things) helps protect them from climate change.
A distinction has sometimes been made between chronic and transitory food insecurity at the household level.8 Chronic food insecurity involves a continuously inadequate diet caused by the persistent inability to acquire food.
For instance, households who are transitory food secure based on DDS indicator can be targeted with policies that could boost household economic access to food.
The implication of this is that about 24 and 18% of the households regarded as transitory food insecure based on DDS and FOODexp respectively were wrongly classified as food secure households from a single indicator stand point (see Table 2).
The implication of this is that about 24 and 18% of the households regarded as transitory food insecure based on DDS and FOODexp respectively were wrongly classified as food secure households from a single indicator standpoint.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com