Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(16)
The fourth class includes 347 nodes with smaller average rail transit length.
The average intercity rail transit length of every node ranges from 0.3 to 37.3 km.
Aerosol transit length from source to exposure was approximately 290 cm.
To address those factors, rail transit length per people versus population density (people per square kilometers) and rail transit length per people versus GDP density (GDP per people) are analyzed.
The models (q) and (r) are used to estimate the intercity rail transit length for each class.
Table 1 shows 16 developed models regarding the rail transit length and associated impact factors as a result of the regression modeling with the 254 sample data.
Similar(44)
Comparing with the available 254 existing intercity rail transit systems in other countries, the intercity rail transit lengths are relatively shorter in the PRD region.
The estimated average intercity rail transit lengths are further broken down into five classes for each of concerned cities, from shorter to longer length.
Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the suitable intercity rail transit lengths or scope over a concerned region in the planning stage in order to make investment plans more substantially optimal.
Table 2 Comparison between estimated and planned total rail transit lengths Population size (10,000) Land use size (km) GDP Level (hundred estimated million dollars) Model estimated intercity rail transit size (km) Model estimated average rail transit size (km) Planned average rail transit size (km) (a) (b) (c) (q) (r) 4772 41,515 3342 3418 486 2820 1278 3461 2293 1890.
Rail freight in North America is also faced with aggressive and near universally available road transport for general and specialist cargo applications which has effectively displaced rail from short and medium sector transit lengths on grounds of cost, service levels, responsiveness and availability.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com