Exact(19)
Our transformation tests demonstrated that MmTKL2 (but not MmTKL1) can partially complement the AAA auxotrophy of a S. cerevisiae tkl1 mutant.
Two Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentestECD) test guidelines are available to detect chemical effects on soil microflora, i.e., the nitrogen and carbon transformation tests [2],[3].
In a series of antigen specific immune response interference tests in mice, human allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction and antigen specific lymphocyte transformation tests, we found that sCD152 had a marked immunosuppressive effect.
Wilcoxon rank transformation tests unveiled statistically significant differences between Group O and Group J, not only in the N-terminal and I3 loop, but also in the E3 loop.
Cylindrical specimens for compression testing are cut from the rolled bar and standard creep tests and thermally induced phase transformation tests are conducted using a custom high-temperature setup.
The soil was then adjusted to 50% ± 5% WHCmax, transferred to glass vessels (500 g for the nitrification and ammonium oxidation activity tests and 1,500 g for the carbon transformation tests), and incubated under aerobic conditions at 20 C ± 2°C for 4 weeks.
Similar(41)
This means that the ability to respire using easily degradable carbon sources such as glucose (the principle of the carbon transformation test) is more widespread than the ability to transform ammonium to nitrite and nitrate.
According to the guidance listed above [1], the nitrogen transformation test is considered sufficient for most non-agrochemical substances.
For the nitrogen transformation test (Table3), we compared wet and dry applications with soil as the carrier.
The standard nitrogen transformation test using lucerne meal suggested that the test materials had no effect, whereas significant effects were identified with the other two test procedures.
However, the same concentrations of test materials showed clear concentration-effect curves in the carbon transformation test (substrate-induced respiration) [3].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com