Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
The number of total possible transformants was calculated by plating dilution aliquots of each transformation reaction on double-dropout plates lacking leucine and tryptophan, which merely selected for the presence of the bait (pGBKT7) and prey (pGADT7-Rec) plasmids; in this case, growth was not dependent on two-hybrid-interacting proteins.
The chitinase activity of transformants was calculated and ranged from 124.1 to 308.8 U mL−1.
Similar(58)
Parasitic rates of the transformants were calculated, and severity of infection was recorded at 72 h.
The copy number of phy in each transformant was calculated using the Ct value of the P. pastoris genomic DNA and a standard curve.
Based on 5 independent transformation experiments, the transformation frequency was calculated as 3.7 × 10-7 (± 14%) transformants per cell.
Transformation frequency was calculated as the ratio of the transformant number to the recipient (competent) cell number.
Transformation frequency was calculated as the ratio of the transformant number to the estimated recipient cell number, which was regarded as half of the total cell number in each sample.
Transformation efficiency (per µg DNA) was calculated as the ratio of the transformant number to the added amount of plasmid DNA.
The transformation frequency in C. reinhardtii was calculated as 1.3 - 1.9 × 10-7 transformants per cell [ 87], which is similar to the values above.
The normalized volume of spots from three replicate 2-D gels was averaged and the standard deviation was calculated for each yeast transformant.
The relative change in protein abundance for the Yap1p-overexpressing transformant (Y) versus the control transformant (C) (indicated with "fold change Y/C") for each protein spot was calculated by dividing the averaged spot quantity from gels with samples from the Yap1p-overexpressing transformant by the averaged spot quantity from gels with samples from the control transformant.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com