Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(15)
Second, we followed a structured approach to grounded theory that involved using a combination of a pre-existing "coding paradigm" and the inductive analysis of transcripts to develop a code list with which to analyze the entire dataset.
We initially reviewed five transcripts to develop a preliminary coding structure through inductive coding in accordance with grounded theory, an approach to qualitative analysis that allows themes to emerge inductively from participants rather than from the preconceptions of the researchers (Corbin and Strauss 1990; Glaser and Strauss 1967).
The research team reviewed the transcripts to develop a code list for the topics related to the research questions.
The research team reviewed the transcripts to develop a code list and transcripts were manually coded for emerging themes.
Instead, we used the verbatim transcripts to develop structured summaries for each interview according to our areas of interest outlined above.
All team members read the transcripts and together undertook line by line coding of five transcripts to develop a set of preliminary themes.
Similar(45)
Iteratively, three team members (AK, HE, and MF) immersed themselves in the data by reading and open coding transcripts independently to develop preliminary codes.
In this study, we characterized the CR gene Rcr1, based on genetic mapping and transcript analysis, to develop markers for MAS and decipher molecular mechanisms of resistance associated with Rcr1.
Two researchers (ER & AM) read the remaining transcripts to further develop themes and categories, in an iterative process of refining and developing categories where data did not fit existing definitions [ 19].
Using the constant comparative method, two abstractors (JA, CA) independently reviewed the interview transcripts to iteratively develop a coding scheme representing the relevant concepts voiced in the interview discussions.
29 30 Coded sections of transcripts were collated to develop themes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com