Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
While this blot provided clear evidence of a widely expressed 4 kb transcript, transcripts above 9 kb in length may not have transferred efficiently to the membrane.
This negative result is, of itself, quite interesting since it indicates that TaVrn3.p is not required for TaVRN1 to be expressed; regardless of the low abundance of the TaVRN3 transcript, transcripts of TaVRN1 exhibited an increase over the time-course.
These results showed that although pGPR120 had 3 transcripts, transcript 1 which encoded pGPR120-WT was the mainly expressed transcript.
GC content, number of transcripts, transcript length and genomic length produced random AUC scores (approximately 0.5; Table 1).
We measured the correlation of AUC for STF-31 with transcript levels of each of 18,988 transcripts (transcript data are publicly available at http://www.broadinstitute.org/ccle).org/ccle
The transcript from the middle promoter (transcript d encoding DAF-19C), however, starts in an exon designated as optional for the longest transcripts (transcript b with the exon, transcript a without) and is therefore nested.
Similar(52)
For a protein species nomenclature we need to distinguish various levels: At the gene level a gene may have one or more than one transcript (transcript level); each transcript may lead to one or more than one translation.
The pGPR120 had 3 alternative transcripts, including a 1086 bp transcript (transcript 1), a 930 transcript (transcript 2), and a 960 bp transcript (transcript 3).
The shortest transcript (transcript c encoding DAF-19M) arises from the most downstream promoter and begins with a unique exon.
Even further downstream in the gene model, there is an optional exon, included in transcripts a/c/d/g in which another nested transcript, transcript h, also begins.
(D ) Using the K1 sense probe, the increase in transcript E was reflected by an increase in detectable levels of Kan r transcript (transcript K).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com