training with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "training with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe someone who is learning a skill with another person or group. For example, "He is training with a personal coach to improve his tennis skills."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Zeizel is training with an immediate purpose.

The New York Times - Sports

Routh finished basic training with meritorious distinction.

The New Yorker

Training with him is like boot camp.

The New Yorker

But training with backward running is different.

The New York Times

Training with a purpose.

Cornell University

Training with François was intense.

Nature

Training with renowned orthopedists like James Andrews.

The New York Times - Sports

Eventually, he started training with another coach.

The New York Times - Sports

Training with suppliers took on large importance.

The New York Times

Intervention: Walking training with cueing of cadence.

Journal of Physiotherapy

And he's training with around 30 students".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing professional development, use "training with" to emphasize the collaboration or mentorship aspect of the learning experience.

Common error

Avoid using "training with" without specifying what or whom you are training with. Always provide context to make the statement clear and meaningful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "training with" functions as a verb phrase indicating the action of learning or improving a skill alongside someone or by using something. Ludwig provides many examples of its use in various contexts. The AI analysis confirms that this is grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Academia

12%

Science

10%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "training with" is a versatile and grammatically correct phrase used to describe the process of learning or improving skills, often in a collaborative or method-specific context. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is widely accepted and used. The examples from Ludwig highlight its prevalence in news, academic, and scientific domains. When writing, ensure that the context is clear by specifying what or whom the training is with. Alternatives like "learning alongside" or "getting coaching from" can be used for nuanced variations. Overall, "training with" is a valuable phrase for describing structured learning and development activities.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

getting coaching from

Highlights the aspect of receiving personalized training and advice.

learning alongside

Focuses on the shared experience of learning in a group setting.

studying in collaboration with

Emphasizes the cooperative aspect of learning.

rehearsing in tandem with

Suggests a coordinated and synchronized practice.

practicing in conjunction with

Highlights the combined practice of different elements or techniques.

preparing under the guidance of

Stresses the mentorship and direction received during preparation.

undergoing instruction by

Emphasizes the process of receiving formal teaching from someone.

developing skills through

Indicates skill enhancement using a particular method or tool.

gaining experience using

Highlights the practical experience acquired while employing a certain resource.

improving knowledge via

Focuses on the increase of knowledge through a specific medium.

FAQs

How can I use "training with" in a sentence?

You can use "training with" to describe the process of learning or practicing a skill alongside someone or using a specific method. For example, "She is training with a renowned coach" or "He is training with weights to build strength".

What are some alternatives to "training with"?

Some alternatives to "training with" include "learning alongside", "studying in collaboration with", or "getting coaching from", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "training with" or "training under"?

Both "training with" and "training under" are correct but convey slightly different meanings. "Training with" suggests collaboration or shared learning, while "training under" implies mentorship or guidance from a superior.

How does "training with" differ from "practicing with"?

"Training with" generally refers to a structured learning process aimed at improving skills or knowledge, whereas "practicing with" often refers to the act of honing existing skills in a less formal setting.