Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
He shows that the difference in the training probabilities is larger between Canadians and non-citizens than between Canadians and naturalised citizens.
Similar(59)
Hypothesis 1: Internationalized firms have lower higher training probability than domestic firms.
We propose that the firm's training probability is higher in this institutional context.
Their estimates show an increase in the training probability ranging between 8 and 11 percentage points.
They find that a 10% increase in net training costs reduces a firm's training probability by 4.5%.
In 2009, the average training probability of an internationalized firm was 27%, a substantially lower value compared to a domestic firm (44%).
In line with these theoretical exploitations that minimum wages could in some circumstances even foster training, Arulampalam et al. (2004) find an increase in workers' training probability following the introduction of the national minimum wage in Britain.
In addition, because the training probability of small internationalized firms is very low, it is also of interest to investigate the qualitative responses of non-training firms concerning the importance of various reasons why they do not offer apprenticeship training.
While small domestic firms with difficulties to find skilled labor on the external labor market increase their training probability by 25%-points, I also find a statistically significant effect for small internationalized firms (+7%-points).
Even when controlling for the qualification structure of the workforce, regional effects, firm size and the sectoral affiliation, small internationalized firms have an almost 18%-point lower training probability than domestic firms (Additional file 1: Table SA.2, model 4).
Large and internationalized firms with more than 50 employees have an 8.5%-points lower training probability compared to domestic firms when controlling for sector, cantons and recruitment strategies (Additional file 1: Table SA.3, model 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com