Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
A trainee survey was undertaken to quantify the degree of familiarity with this clinical tool in the Severn deanery in the South West of the UK.
*Domain 4 is not assessed by trainee survey but by collecting information regarding Deanery recruitment processes.
As part of our quality improvement programme, it does not require ethical approval, any more than the annual national trainee survey does.
Some countries include a trainee survey for both interns (first year of postgraduate training) and residents (specialty trainees) e.g. USA, Canada and UK [ 7, 8].
It is difficult to access detailed local information from the national GMC trainee survey especially in depth specialty and subspecialty information.
More recently, 8% of trainees who responded to the General Medical Council annual trainee survey reported that they had made a serious or potentially serious error in the last month; a substantial proportion of trainees attributed these errors to sleep deprivation and working longer hours [ 10].
Similar(54)
Increasing satisfaction with increasing seniority has however also been suggested in other published trainee surveys [ 7, 16].
The interview included: 1) Questions from the General Medical Council (GMC) 2010 National Training Survey [ 13]. 2) Additional questions covered by previous local trainee surveys carried out at SLaM.
These stated that Postgraduate Deans should ensure an effective programme of monitoring and advised the use of trainee surveys especially as a source of information on patient safety [ 1].
A British cardiology trainees' survey supported this finding; only 9.4%% of trainees involved in ICD insertion always discussed the future possibility of device deactivation with patients [ 74].
In 2006, an annual national UK trainees' survey was begun by the GMC using their standards for training posts and 9 domains for postgraduate deaneries (Table 1) [ 17, 18].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com