trained in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "trained in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone has received education or instruction in a specific skill or field. Example: "She is trained in graphic design and has worked on various projects."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

I'm trained in honesty.

The New Yorker

Professional dancers trained in Russia.

The New Yorker

Initially, she trained in nursing.

The Guardian

Trained in intelligence, Camp Ritchie.

The New York Times

"I trained in the streets".

The New Yorker

Trained in a camp?

The New York Times

I trained in Shakespeare.

The Guardian - Opinion

He trained in Boston.

The New York Times

Are you trained in any particular medium?

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

Inspectors are trained in-house.

The Guardian

I was well-trained in my role.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing someone's qualifications, use "trained in" to emphasize the specific area of instruction or skill development they have received. For instance, "She is trained in emergency medicine" clearly indicates her medical specialization.

Common error

Avoid using "trained at" when specifying a field of expertise. "Trained at" is more suitable for indicating the location or institution where the training occurred, whereas "trained in" correctly identifies the subject or skill.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "trained in" functions as a verb phrase followed by a preposition, indicating that someone has received specific education, instruction, or practice in a particular field or skill. As Ludwig AI shows, it's commonly used to describe expertise.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Wiki

24%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

4%

Encyclopedias

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "trained in" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to denote expertise or skill acquired through specific instruction. Ludwig AI confirms its acceptability and wide usage across various contexts, including news, science, and general knowledge. When using this phrase, it is important to specify the area of training clearly and avoid confusion with similar phrases like "trained at". Alternatives like "skilled in" or "proficient in" may be used to emphasize current ability or expertise, respectively.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

skilled in

Focuses more on the current ability rather than the process of learning.

proficient in

Highlights a high degree of competence and expertise.

experienced in

Emphasizes practical knowledge gained through direct involvement.

educated in

Implies a formal learning environment and theoretical understanding.

versed in

Suggests a deep and comprehensive knowledge of a subject.

competent in

Indicates a satisfactory level of skill and ability.

qualified in

Highlights the possession of formal qualifications or certifications.

specialized in

Denotes a focus on a particular area of expertise.

well-versed in

Adds emphasis to the breadth and depth of knowledge.

knowledgeable in

Stresses the possession of information and understanding.

FAQs

How can I use "trained in" in a sentence?

You can use "trained in" to indicate someone's area of expertise or the specific skills they have acquired through training. For example, "He is "trained in first aid"" or "She is "trained in graphic design"".

What are some alternatives to "trained in"?

Some alternatives include "skilled in", "proficient in", "experienced in", or "educated in", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "trained at" instead of "trained in"?

While "trained at" can be used to indicate the location of the training, "trained in" is more appropriate when specifying the subject or field of expertise. For example, "He trained at Harvard" refers to the institution, whereas "He is "trained in law"" specifies his area of expertise.

What's the difference between "trained in" and "certified in"?

"Trained in" indicates that someone has received instruction or education in a particular area. "Certified in", on the other hand, implies that someone has met specific standards and received official recognition or certification in that area. Certification usually involves passing an exam or meeting certain requirements to demonstrate competence.