Sentence examples for tracing rate from inspiring English sources

This in turn may have led to the increased tracing rate of suspects.

Moreover, a slightly higher first level contact tracing rate will not alter the dynamics significantly (row 1, Table 2).

Only when the first level contact tracing rate is drastically increased (more than tripled in row 2, Table 2), will the solution go to disease free.

Advantages of this study include the representativeness of the participants (Wadsworth et al, in press) and a high tracing rate of mammograms (91%).

We successfully obtained copies of mammograms for 1319 of the 1471 women who gave consent (90% tracing rate), the large majority (1249 (95%)) from NHS breast screening centres.

Moreover, drastic increase (by more than three-fold) in the first level contact tracing rate is need for the system to become disease free.

Tracing rates for each completed wave ranged from 90 to 94%, and interview rates ranged from 91to96%6% of those traced.

One of the relevant studies recommends that increasing the efficiency of contact tracing (higher contact tracing rates) is ideal for large-scale intervention programs in developing countries with limited resources.

The initial fractions are (x 0), y2 0), y3 0)) = (0.3,0.17,0.04). 1. Increasing the efficiency of contact tracing (higher contact tracing rates k2 and k3) is less effective than other means of detection (e.g., random screening), but is perhaps less costly and more cost-effective, and hence is ideal for large-scale intervention programs in developing countries with limited resources.

When comparing the control group before and after the intervention, there were no differences in these five rates, while the intervention group showed significant increases in all rates except in the tracing arrival rate compared to before the intervention (37.0% vs. 69.2%, p = 0.06, data not shown).

After the intervention, all rates were significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group, except for the tracing arrival rate (69.2% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.31) (Table 4).