LIWC also provides a total word count, the number of words per sentence, and the percentage of words which are longer than 6 letters.
In Table 4, the average ξ c of subsequent intervals of the total word Hallå is presented (number of sequences differ between 9 and 23).
They were scored for the number of total words they used, the number of distinct words used, and two indicators of narrative quality: story structure score (inclusion of appropriate story elements and sequence) and language score (clarity and complexity of grammatical features in the story).
Because the proportion of center words (nodes) to total words is 1/16, the expected number of hash references is 1/16 ∗ 1 + 15/16 ∗ 7 = 6.625, which is 41.4% of the number of exact and 1-mismatch subsequences.
3 In 2007, the denominator = 55530 words (i.e. total number of words in ALL 2007 debates) 1 n = total number of words per testimony of stakeholder group.
Vocabulary was assessed by means of counts of total number of words and total different words.
This quantitative presentation provides an overview of the policy goals and themes that drove the debate. 1 For 2004 debates, the denominator = 108536 words (i.e. total number of words in ALL 2004 debates) 2 For 2007 debates, the denominator = 55530 words (i.e. total number of words in ALL 2007 debates) 3 These percentages aggregate all stakeholders and political parties.
A story-writing test was conducted and scored on 4 subscales: Total Number of Words, Words per Sentence, Morphosyntax, and Semantics.
Tables 4 and 5 illustrate the breakdown of themes by stakeholder group and political party for the 2004 and 2007 deliberations. 1 In 2004, the denominator = 108536 words (i.e. total number of words in ALL 2004 debates) 2 These percentages aggregate all stakeholders and political parties.
In other words, the total number of generated data packets depends on the number of deployed nodes.
