Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
These analyses resulted in 15 (oppositional), 8 (DSM-IV: inattentive), 6 (DSM-IV: hyperactive), and 5 (DSM-IV: total) significantly different pairs of study-centres (probability level adjusted for multiple tests; Figure S3 in additional file 4).
Similar(59)
A total of 161 or 162 metabolites (approximately 78%% of total metabolites) had significantly different concentrations across DPA in Gb or Gh fiber (p ≤ 0.05); (Additional file 3).
Similar to the TBARS data, only E40 animals (3.88 ± 0.66 nmol carbonyl/mg total proteins) were significantly different from CS animals (2.67 ± 0.63 nmol carbonyl/mg total proteins,) in terms of carbonyl protein level.
The mean WHODASII score did not show any significant difference in this subanalysis while for MIDAS and PHQ9, total scores were significantly different (Table 6).
Patterns of 3D scapular attitudes and scapular total ROM were significantly different between flexion and abduction arm positions (P <.05).
External design and development difficulties, rolling-out difficulties and total scores were significantly different with regard to levels of Internet experience.
The number of farms and the total UAA are significantly different among the case study areas (Table 6).
Statistically, the total porosity was significantly different among the land uses (P ≤ 0.01) and within the soil depths (P ≤ 0.05), but not in their interaction effects (P > 0.05) (Table 1).
Although this difference was not significant at baseline (p > 0.05), the LDQ total score was significantly different (p < 0.001) at the 1-year follow-up visit between the responder group (7.8 ± 2.3) and the Non-Responder group (12.1 ± 2.1).
The correlations between each dimension and the total scale were significantly different (table 5).
All subscale scores and the total score were significantly different between subgroups for both work status and activity status.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com