Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Finally, the PBF is the CDR divided by the total intervention rate.
The total intervention rate (TIR) is the healthy women intervention rate (a percentage of the diagnostic evaluation rate) plus the CDR (women with cancer intervention rate).
Finally, we multiplied the subsequent mammography intervention rates by the first/subsequent ratio of 2.4 for women over 50 to estimate the total intervention rate for a baseline mammogram of 38 48/1000.
In order to promote consumer-oriented informed medical decision-making regarding screening mammography, we created a decision model to predict the age dependence of the cancer detection rate, the recall rate and the secondary performance measures (positive predictive values, total intervention rate, and positive biopsy fraction) for a baseline mammogram.
Similar(56)
We obtained total intervention rates from the BCSC and the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program NBCCEDPP) for first screening mammograms, the latter targeting low-income women.
The higher predicted CDR from our model is conservative in that it will result in higher predicted PPV performance measures in Figures 4 and 5. Consequently, we could improve our model with better estimates of risk-adjustable prevalence and sojourn time, as well as baseline total intervention rates.
Figure 5 also shows that the predicted total baseline mammogram intervention rate for women over 50 varies from 39/1000 at age 50 to 51/1000 at age 65.
The three variables (coverage rate, diagnosis rate and intervention rate) determined the total number of deaf infants finally receiving early interventions and benefiting from the screening program.
The second endpoint was the intervention rate defined as the total numbers of each intervention provided per antenatal visit.
This probability assumption allows correlation with published total (cancer and benign) intervention rates and predicts a healthy women (benign) intervention rate after baseline screening of 32.1/1000 at age 40 to 31.6/1000 at age 60.
Total intervention time did not mediate efficacy.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com