Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
end{aligned}Since the total increment of (Psi) is ((#(p'_n)+#(q'_m)+2)pi), the number of points satisfying the condition (A) must be larger than those satisfying (B) by exactly (#(p'_n)+#(q'_m)+2).
Summing up, the total increment of (Psi) over ([0,2kpi )) is ((2+k+2#(q'_m))pi =(2+#(p'_n)+#(q'_m))pi) and, therefore, there are at least (#(p'_n)+#(q'_m)+2) points (and exactly (#(p'_n)+#(q'_m)+2) if (Psi) is monotone) where the condition (9) holds. Suppose now that (Psi) is not monotone.
There is a total increment of 37.9% with 10 years period.
There was a total increment of 211.7 billion ETB with a mean (SD) increment rate of 16.3 (20.7) billion ETB per year.
There was a total increment of 2624.5 ETB with a mean (SD) increment rate of 201.9 269.88) ETB per year per capita.
The total increment of insulin dose was 45% higher in twin pregnancies compared with singleton pregnancies and not twice as much, corresponding well to the 45% higher fetal mass and 74% higher placental mass in these pregnancies.
Similar(54)
The total increments of X j for j = 1, 2, …, k are denoted as Δ X j ≡ X j − X j − 1 = X ( x j, y j ) − X ( x j − 1, y j − 1 ).
The method of calculating the total increment we should assign to the magnets is still the same with the method we use above when balance the floating plate in x direction.
Also the total increment until a specific rotation time will show huge differences between the increments of Gotilwa+ and the local yield table for the same MAI.
These data correspond to a total current increment of 91 303 m3 per year and a planned yield of 37 465 m3 per year, with a yield saving of 53 838 m3 per year.
A comparison of these numbers with the predictions previously obtained in the initial paper describing our method, in which we used the UniprotKB (update 2012_02) from February 2012 [ 27], illustrates the increase in the number of predictions between these two versions in just twenty months, totaling an increment of more than 61% from the approximately 17400 predictions obtained at that time.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com