Exact(2)
Chemical space can be defined as "the total descriptor space covered by all the known and possible small organic compounds" [1].
The first three (i) a sensory descriptor score of the pain experience, (ii) an affective descriptor score of the pain experience and (iii) a composite total descriptor score for pain over the past week were rated on a four-point pain intensity scale (none (0)–severe (3).
Similar(58)
Each node of the tree is split using the best subset of total descriptors randomly chosen at that node.
Other measures of pain quality, pain intensity, pain relief, and quality of life (QOL) also improved significantly, including BPI pain interference with general activities, normal work, and QOL composite score (P<.05); NPS individual pain character scores for intense (P<.01), hot, or unpleasant (P<.05) pain; BDI scores (P<.0001); MPQ total descriptors score (P<.01); and SQS score.
Three pain scores (sensory, affective, and total descriptors) are derived from the sum of the intensity rank values of the words chosen for descriptors.
Three pain scores are derived from the sum of the intensity rank values of the words chosen for sensory, affective and total descriptors.
Three pain scores are derived from the sum of the intensity rank values of the words chosen for sensory, affective and total descriptors and may range from 0 to 45 [ 43].
It was found that the π system fragment point descriptors could be merged for the two fragments (summing their values - π total number descriptors) without changing results (201 descriptors).
The presented results were obtained by using biological measurements and laboratory data (in total 56 descriptors) as the first layer, and symptoms and clinical data (in total 187 descriptors) as the second layer.
Of the total 1027 descriptors calculated for all the six substitution sites, 298 were selected and the invariable descriptors were removed.
In total, 119 descriptors remained after this prefiltering step.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com