total control

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "total control" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where someone has complete authority or power over something or someone. For example: - The CEO had total control over the company's finances. - The government imposed total control over the media, censoring any dissenting voices. - The new security system gave parents total control over who could enter the school grounds. - The dictator maintained total control over the country through fear and intimidation.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Sports

General Usage

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Total control is totally exhausting.

Forbes

She radiates total control.

The New Yorker

He's in total control.

The New York Times - Sports

"You're in total control".

The New York Times - Sports

We have total control".

The New York Times

Total control," she said.

The Guardian

He assumed total control.

The Guardian

He seeks total control.

The Guardian - Opinion

Total control of the climate?

The Guardian

She is in total control.

The Guardian - Sport

"Total control," was his answer.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "total control", ensure the context clearly defines what is being controlled and the extent of that control. Specificity enhances clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "total control" when the situation involves influence or partial command. Overstating the level of authority can undermine credibility. For example, avoid phrases like "I have total control over the weather" if it is not a weather-controlling device.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "total control" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often serving as the object of a verb or the complement of a preposition. It describes the state of having complete authority or command over something. Ludwig confirms that it's frequently used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Sports

20%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Wiki

5%

Science

10%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "total control" is a grammatically correct and very common noun phrase used to describe a state of complete authority or command. Ludwig AI confirms its frequent usage across various contexts, particularly in news, sports, and formal business settings. While generally neutral in register, it's important to use it accurately, avoiding overstatements of actual control. Alternatives like "complete dominance" or "absolute authority" may be appropriate depending on the specific nuance intended. Ensure clarity and specificity when describing what is being controlled.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

complete dominance

Focuses on absolute superiority and influence.

absolute authority

Emphasizes unrestricted power and decision-making capability.

full command

Highlights the ability to direct and manage resources effectively.

unfettered power

Suggests power that is unrestrained and unlimited.

supreme rule

Indicates the highest level of governance and control.

overall command

Similar to "full command", focusing on the ability to direct and manage resources, but highlights the complete scope of that direction.

ultimate authority

Focuses on the final and decisive power in a given situation or domain.

complete mastery

Focuses on comprehensive skill and expertise leading to control.

carte blanche

Emphasizes the unrestricted authority to act at one's own discretion.

iron grip

Implies strict and unyielding control, often associated with authoritarian contexts.

FAQs

How can I use "total control" in a sentence?

You can use "total control" to describe a situation where someone or something has complete authority or command. For example, "The CEO had total control over the company's finances."

What are some alternatives to saying "total control"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "complete dominance", "absolute authority", or "full command".

Is it always positive to have "total control"?

Not necessarily. While "total control" can be desirable in some situations (e.g., managing a project), it can also have negative connotations (e.g., authoritarian regimes).

What's the difference between "total control" and "significant influence"?

"Total control" implies complete authority and command, while "significant influence" suggests a considerable impact or effect without necessarily having direct power.