Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
No existing systematic reviews or clinical practice guidelines based on a systematic review or randomised controlled trials focusing on this topic were found.
No randomized clinical trials on this topic were found.
Two systematic reviews related to this topic were found.
Twelve observational studies on the topic were found, including three studies in which CCR was used.
No other differences in sharing across targets by topic were found.
Few publications on this specific topic were found, though there is an increasing wider literature on PBF.
Similar(53)
Firstly, sometimes the topic was found to be too general, which made the discussions less focused.
Indeed, the topic was found to be poorly covered.
No comprehensive review and synthesis of general international published or grey literature on this specific topic was found.
Since little research on this topic was found searching scientific databases, a broader search strategy had to be used.
This topic was found to receive the lowest score in spite of the previous lecture given to the students (Table 3, p = 0,038).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com