Also, the domain of each worry topic was classified into one of four categories: work/study worries, social/relationship worries, financial worries, and physical worries, and a random sample of 25% of these were also rated by a graduate psychologist rated in order to provide inter-rater reliability, Kappa = .78, p < .001.001
These topics were classified again, as shown in Fig. 4, to expose the position of trends as attractive to the development of science and technology in their country depending on its scientific and technological capacity.
PCG topics were classified as follows: (1) antenatal care; (2) pregnancy complications; (3) fetal complications; (4) intrapartum issues; or (5) postpartum issues.
Topics were classified into 19 categories and their frequency analyzed across groups of countries with similar per capita income.
The responses to the first question, asking about take-away points, were categorized based on similar responses; specific answers about discrete principles or topics were classified as physiology concepts (e.g., Frank-Starling curve), whereas general ideas or problem-solving approaches were classified as themes (e.g., learning to integrate physiology across organ systems).
These topics are classified and characterized in various ways in order to understand the motive forces behind their emergence, whether scientific discovery, technological innovation, or exogenous events.
These topics are classified into three categories, i.e., diagnosis, test and treatment, with 10 topics in each category.
The sixteenth theme was classified Miscellaneous to capture topics that failed to fit within the previous 15 themes.
The students wrote weekly in journals, and reflected on a number of topics that were classified into six major themes [ 12].
HCPs that correctly remembered the reach study message topic with and without prompting were classified as having correctly recalled the message.
